Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor vs Asynchronous Motor: How to Choose for Electro-Hydraulic Servo Systems?

April 26, 2026
についての最新の会社ニュース Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor vs Asynchronous Motor: How to Choose for Electro-Hydraulic Servo Systems?

1. Motor Selection Is Key to Electro-Hydraulic Servo Systems

 

In electro-hydraulic servo systems, motor selection directly affects energy efficiency, response speed, and operational stability. The VEIKONG VFD550I series electro-hydraulic servo drive features dual-motor compatibility. According to the product brochure, this series can seamlessly drive both permanent magnet synchronous motors and asynchronous motors. So how should users make their choice in practical applications? This article analyzes the question from both technical characteristics and application scenarios.

 

 2. Core Advantages of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors

 

The MFD series AC permanent magnet synchronous servo motor, which pairs with the VFD550I series, is specifically developed by VEIKONG for hydraulic control applications. According to the brochure, this motor offers several technical advantages.

 

First, higher power density. Compared with conventional motors, the power density of permanent magnet synchronous motors increases by more than 20%, with smaller size and more compact structure, making them suitable for installation scenarios with limited space.

 

Second, advanced thermal management. The motor uses a one-piece molded housing with a maximum temperature rise controlled within 50°C, providing excellent heat dissipation and low temperature rise.

 

Third, reluctance torque optimization. Under the same torque output, current consumption of permanent magnet synchronous motors is reduced by 15%, resulting in smaller losses for both the motor and controller, significantly improving system efficiency.

 

Fourth, fast response characteristics. When paired with the VFD5501 drive, permanent magnet synchronous motors achieve system latency of 20ms, with rapid pressure response and flow stabilization time not exceeding 50ms.

 

 3. Application Scenarios for Asynchronous Motors

 

Asynchronous motors, as traditional AC motor types, still have wide applications in some retrofit projects. According to the brochure, the VFD550I series also supports asynchronous motor drive. The advantage of asynchronous motors lies in their relatively lower cost. In many old equipment retrofit projects, users may wish to keep the original motor to reduce transformation costs. Additionally, asynchronous motor control technology is mature with well-established maintenance systems. For application scenarios that do not require particularly high response speed, asynchronous motors remain an economically viable choice.

 

 4. Energy Saving Differences Between the Two Motor Types

 

Energy saving is one of the core values of electro-hydraulic servo systems. According to actual application cases in the brochure, the solution using the VFD550I electro-hydraulic servo system paired with permanent magnet synchronous motors saves 20% to 60% of electricity compared with traditional hydraulic systems. In one hydraulic station retrofit project, the measured power saving rate reached 51.2%. In a metal hydraulic baler application, the system single-cycle time was reduced to 96 seconds while achieving 20% to 60% power savings. Although asynchronous motors can also achieve some energy savings, their efficiency under low-speed, high-torque conditions is not as good as that of permanent magnet synchronous motors.

 

 5. Comparison of Control Precision and Response Speed

 

For high-precision hydraulic equipment such as injection molding machines and die-casting machines, control precision is a key indicator. According to the brochure, when the VFD550I is paired with a permanent magnet synchronous motor, pressure control overshoot is less than or equal to ±1%, steady-state fluctuation is less than or equal to ±0.5 Bar, and pressure response is completed within 20ms. Displacement accuracy reaches 0.1mm. These indicators ensure the stability and consistency of injection molded product quality. Asynchronous motors under V/F control and open-loop vector control can also meet general precision requirements, but they are slightly inferior to permanent magnet synchronous motors in low-speed performance and dynamic response.

 

 6. VFD550I Dual-Motor Compatible Design

 

VEIKONG has fully considered the needs of different users. According to the technical specifications in the brochure, the VFD550I series supports three control modes: V/F control, sensorless flux vector control without PG card, and sensor speed flux vector control with PG card. This flexible control mode selection allows the same drive to either drive permanent magnet synchronous motors for high-performance operation or drive asynchronous motors to meet basic application needs. Users can choose the most appropriate motor type based on actual project budget and performance requirements.

 

 7. Conclusion: How to Make Your Choice

 

In summary, the choice between permanent magnet synchronous motors and asynchronous motors should be based on the following factors. If the project pursues high energy efficiency, fast response, and high-precision control, permanent magnet synchronous motors are the better choice, especially suitable for equipment such as injection molding machines, die-casting machines, and hydraulic balers. If the project budget is limited and requirements for response speed and energy savings are not high, asynchronous motors can serve as an economical alternative. The dual-motor compatible design of the VEIKONG VFD550I series electro-hydraulic servo drive provides users with flexible selection options. Whichever motor you choose, you will obtain stable and reliable drive control.

 

Related words:

VFD550I series

electro-hydraulic servo drive

20ms response time